AI Peer Review
Better reviews, better science. Get calibrated scores, citation audit, and detailed comments in an editable workspace you can share with collaborators.
In this work, we model the risk of hospitalization for a large number of drug-disease combinations. Our methodology is akin to genome-wide association studies (GWAS), in which a simple model is used to estimate the effect of a large number of loci in a hypothesis-free manner. As in GWAS, this screen risks spurious relationships and requires further analysis, but complements target-driven repurposing.
The GWAS analogy is one of the paper's best conceptual moves. Bring it into the abstract with one sentence on the exact parallel: large-scale hypothesis-free enumeration plus multiplicity correction and follow-up validation. That repositioning would make the contribution easier to distinguish from pair-specific observational studies.
Humans in the loop
Our reviews update with your comments. Iterate together until the review completely reflects your read.
Consistent, benchmarked, multi-faceted scores
We evaluate each publication based on multiple aspects, including the novelty of the work, the quality of the presentation, and experimental rigor.
Some of this week's best preprints
More on rankings| # | Paper | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Zhili Li et al.Computer Vision | 1 | Zhili Li et al.Computer Vision | 82.7 | |
Byungsoo Oh, Rachee SinghDistributed Computing | 2 | Byungsoo Oh, Rachee SinghDistributed Computing | 82.6 | |
Ahammed Ullah, Alex PothenDiscrete Mathematics | 3 | Ahammed Ullah, Alex PothenDiscrete Mathematics | 81.3 | |
Julia Chuzhoy et al.Discrete Mathematics | 4 | Julia Chuzhoy et al.Discrete Mathematics | 81.0 | |
Jasper Dekoninck et al.Machine Learning | 5 | Jasper Dekoninck et al.Machine Learning | 81.0 | |
| 6 | 79.7 | |||
SangHyun ParkDiscrete Mathematics | 7 | SangHyun ParkDiscrete Mathematics | 79.5 | |
879.3 Ignasi Sau et al.Logic | 8 | Ignasi Sau et al.Logic | 79.3 | |
| 9 | 79.0 | |||
Lu Dai et al.Information Retrieval | 10 | Lu Dai et al.Information Retrieval | 78.7 |
Get your work graded
Your first review is free. Pay as you go or subscribe for additional features.