DynMuon: A Dynamic Spectral Shaping View of Muon

Machine LearningarXiv:2605.17109PDF

Publish this paper in The AIPR Journal

Are you an author? Turn this AI review into a permanent, citable journal entry with a cover, open comments, and Scholar metadata.

AIPR assessment

Problem difficulty is high: this sits in a crowded, well-optimized area, large-scale LLM pretraining optimizers, where small gains matter and baselines are strong. The strengths reinforce each other well, a simple method, a plausible mechanism, broad ablations, and low overhead all point in the same direction. The main weaknesses also interact, the mechanistic model is intentionally idealized, and there is no external code or deployment evidence in the text, so the practical claim is supported m

Abstract

In recent years, Muon has emerged as the dominant method for training large language models, and transformers more broadly. The essential difference, when compared to standard gradient descent methods, is to replace the usual update matrix $M=UΣV^\top$ with its polar factor $UV^\top$. In this work, we consider a class of Muon-like updates, where we replace the update $M$ with $UΣ^p V^\top$ for some parameter $p$. We call this a "spectral-shaping" operation, and develop a theory of how to pick $p$ which depends on (a) local curvature of the loss function, (b) noise stemming from stochastic gradients and label noise, and (c) training stage. Our theory and experimentation reveal a previously overlooked behavior: positive $p$ helps early by emphasizing high-curvature directions and accelerating signal contraction, while mildly negative $p$ helps later by reallocating update strength toward low-curvature directions that still contain useful training signals. Building on the insight, we propose DynMuon, an efficient dynamic spectral shaping method that schedules $p$ from positive to mildly negative over training. Extensive experiments across model sizes, architectures, and training settings show that DynMuon consistently achieves lower validation loss than Muon, while requiring 10.6-26.5% fewer steps to reach the same target loss. Our code is available at https://github.com/fzwark/DynMuon.

Score Breakdown

Holistic Impression
76
Novelty
74
Rigor
76
Applicability
77
Clarity
80
Citation
80
Confidence: 85%

More from this week

More in Machine Learning