Probing In-Solid Proton Energy Distributions in Laser-Driven Fusion via Nuclear Activation Diagnostics

Computational PhysicsarXiv:2605.09191PDF

Publish this paper in The AIPR Journal

Are you an author? Turn this AI review into a permanent, citable journal entry with a cover, open comments, and Scholar metadata.

AIPR assessment

This is a hard experimental-physics problem with a specialized but important application space, not a saturated benchmark-style field. The strongest elements reinforce each other: a new internal diagnostic idea, quantitative inversion with uncertainty propagation, and a validating control geometry. The main weaknesses also compound: the in-target result lacks direct external benchmarking, the inversion depends on modeled cross sections and stopping power, and the debris-detection assumptions are

Abstract

The energy distribution of energetic protons inside a solid target is a key quantity governing nuclear reaction yields and energy deposition in high-intensity laser-driven fusion, including nonthermal proton--boron (p--B) schemes and proton fast ignition. Yet it has remained inaccessible to conventional particle diagnostics, which detect only ions escaping the target and are perturbed by intense plasma electromagnetic fields. Here we establish a quantitative diagnostic that uses nuclear activation reactions occurring within the target itself as an internal probe of the in-solid proton energy distribution. Applied to laser-driven p--B fusion experiments on the kJ-class laser, the method reconstructs an exponential-equivalent in-solid proton energy distribution from the absolute yields of $^{11}\mathrm{C}$ and $^{7}\mathrm{Be}$ produced via $\mathrm{^{11}B(p,n)^{11}C}$ and $\mathrm{^{10}B(p,α)^{7}Be}$, and yields the absolute number of $\mathrm{^{11}B(p,2α)^{4}He}$ reactions through a side-channel analysis with propagated cross-section uncertainties. This work opens a quantitative window onto the in-solid proton dynamics that drive nuclear reactions in laser-driven fusion experiments.

Score Breakdown

Holistic Impression
76
Novelty
83
Rigor
79
Applicability
67
Clarity
80
Citation
76
Confidence: 85%

More from this week

More in Computational Physics